HarnessMM: Recursive Self-Improvement for Harness Token Efficiency

On HumanEval, HarnessMM preserves Codex success at 90.82\% while reducing tokens per task from 66.72k to 47.02k (29.54\% saving). It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 9 November 2026. HarnessMinusMinus (HarnessMM) is a research project on improving the efficiency of agent harnesses, the software coordinating model reasoning, tool execution, and feedback. This technical report consolidates its shared framework, implementations, and empirical studies across coding, tool-based, and visual-agent settings. Agent harnesses often invoke reasoning after each tool result, even when earlier calls have already determined subsequent actions. HarnessMM addresses this overhead through guarded decision reuse and recursive self-improvement (RSI). RSI refines author prompts, context settings, and adapter rules using training feedback, with validation selecting deployment configurations. At inference time, a controller reuses resolved decisions while keeping actor weights fixed. Executable Decision Graphs encode actions, arguments, dependencies, and guards. Guarded Decision Reuse activates eligible decisions from observed feedback, while Certified Callback Substitution executes them through native tool interfaces, replacing redundant reasoning callbacks. The original actor resumes when new reasoning is required or reuse conditions are unmet. For DeepSeek Harness, success improves from 71.43\% to 85.71\% while tokens decrease from 96.28k to 11.62k (87.93\% saving). An MBPP ablation shows 26.91\% lower cost than single-use graphs and 19.52\% lower cost than retained callbacks. The report also summarizes the HarnessMM-V visual-agent study and documents optimization overhead and execution time where measured. Together, these studies investigate guarded decision reuse across diverse agent harness settings. Code is available at https://github.com/YuhuaJiang2002/HarnessMM.

Why it counts

On HumanEval, HarnessMM preserves Codex success at 90.82\% while reducing tokens per task from 66.72k to 47.02k (29.54\% saving). For DeepSeek Harness, success improves from 71.43\% to 85.71\% while tokens decrease from 96.28k to 11.62k (87.93\% saving).

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.