TSR Desk · science · 6 November 2026, 01:00 UTC
Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and
- What
- Patients With Personality: Realistic Patient Simulation through Controlled Diversity and Selective Disclosure
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 5 November 2026, 05:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.17441
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
We evaluate PWP in the first direct comparison of different patient simulators under a shared protocol, anchored in transcripts of real physician-patient encounters. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 5 November 2026. Realistic patient simulation is a key requirement for developing and testing clinical LLMs at scale without costly user studies. Existing simulators lack realism and controllability: they overshare information and miss the variability of real patient behavior. Here, we introduce PatientsWithPersonality (PWP), a patient simulation framework that generates realistic yet diverse patient responses through explicit personality parametrization over a latent patient state. Grounded in the six-dimensional HEXACO personality model, it gives fine-grained control over conversational style, cooperativeness, and information disclosure. Clinicians judge PWP conversations as realistic at least as often as the recorded encounters themselves and far more often than prior simulators, and almost never flag them as "too informative". Our simulator also reproduces the disclosure pacing of real patients, and its HEXACO-conditioned personality traits can be recovered by clinicians and an autorater. PWP further shows a substantially wider behavioral range than the closest baseline. In a downstream benchmark, LLMs interviewing patients simulated by PWP perform closest to how they perform on the real encounters, whereas prior simulators make the task easier. PWP thus provides a realistic, steerable, and diverse patient population for improving and benchmarking clinical LLMs.
Why it counts
We evaluate PWP in the first direct comparison of different patient simulators under a shared protocol, anchored in transcripts of real physician-patient encounters.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.