FilingLoop: Evaluating and Evolving LLM Agents for Corporate Disclosure Review and Revision

We introduce \textbf{FilingLoop}, an interactive benchmark and a self-evolving agent framework for corporate disclosure review and revision. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 30 October 2026. Public disclosure repositories such as SEC EDGAR support informed investment through web access to corporate filings. Supporting their review with language model agents requires discovering unstated deficiencies across related documents, acquiring missing company facts, and verifying that requested revisions satisfy evidence-backed requirements. Existing financial question-answering evaluations provide limited evidence of these interactive capabilities. Grounded in historical U.S.\ Securities and Exchange Commission correspondence, FilingLoop reconstructs 380 predominantly IPO review tasks from 96 companies under distinct information constraints. An evaluator separate from the acting agents scores final filings and responses against 6,099 eligible requirements and audits unsupported claims and harmful revisions. Our framework couples iterative review and revision within each case with procedural learning across cases, converting requirement-level evaluation feedback into role-specific guidance without updating model weights. Updates affect only subsequent cases, allowing procedural adaptation to be assessed without retrying scored tasks. On the evaluated stream, evolution increases requirement fulfillment from 24.28\% to 27.96\% and full comment resolution from 16.90\% to 20.75\%, with a 5.8\% increase in total cost over the fixed-policy variant. FilingLoop connects the concerns an agent discovers with the company facts it obtains and the revisions it commits, providing requirement-level feedback for procedures used in later review tasks.

Why it counts

We introduce \textbf{FilingLoop}, an interactive benchmark and a self-evolving agent framework for corporate disclosure review and revision.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.