TSR Desk · science · 27 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
Noise-Robust Financial Numerical Entity Attribute Tagging
- What
- Noise-Robust Financial Numerical Entity Attribute Tagging
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 26 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.24910
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Under both unfiltered and noise-filtered test settings, it achieves the best mean Accuracy and Macro F1 over the four attributes, with the largest gain on time-relation prediction, while remaining competitive on concept name, scale, and sign. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 26 October 2026. Financial Numerical Entity (FNE) understanding aims to recover the meaning of numerical mentions in financial reports. Existing studies focus on concept name prediction and face two important limitations. First, labels derived from inline XBRL may contain errors because filings are usually prepared manually. Second, other important FNE attributes, such as reporting-time relation, measurement scale, and accounting sign, are less emphasized. We propose NOise-Robust Tagging for Rich Financial Numerical Entity Attributes (NORA) to address these gaps. NORA uses task-aware instance-specific weighting to attenuate the influence of noisy labels during training, and we develop an evaluation protocol that filters noisy labels in real-world test sets. In addition, we construct a large-scale benchmark containing 11.4 million FNEs in 6.3 million sentences with multi-attribute labels and filing metadata. Experiments show that NORA performs strongly compared with previous financial numeric tagging models and noisy-label baselines. These results demonstrate the value of modeling rich FNE attributes with document context while accounting for label noise in real-world financial filings.
Why it counts
Under both unfiltered and noise-filtered test settings, it achieves the best mean Accuracy and Macro F1 over the four attributes, with the largest gain on time-relation prediction, while remaining competitive on concept name, scale, and sign. First, labels derived from inline XBRL may contain errors because filings are usually prepared manually.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.