MedHarnessBench: A Unified Benchmark for Healthcare Agent Evaluation

These results demonstrate that healthcare-specific runtime support can substantially improve both task completion and execution quality, while revealing failures that terminal outcomes alone cannot capture. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 14 October 2026. Healthcare agents must transform longitudinal clinical evidence into reliable actions through heterogeneous tools and stateful workflows, conditions under which model-centric systems may lose context, misuse tools, fail to verify consequential transitions, or cross authorization boundaries. Existing medical-agent benchmarks primarily emphasize terminal task outcomes, making it difficult to determine whether execution failures arise from the agent model, the runtime harness, or their interaction. We present the Medical Harness Protocol, an outcome-preserving framework that independently evaluates seven healthcare-specific process dimensions: Care Action Fulfillment, Clinical Resource Competence, Patient-Evidence Alignment, Clinical Workflow Continuity, Clinical Auditability, Closed-Loop Verification, and Clinical Conduct Boundaries. A normalized intervention trace further tracks whether runtime support is available, activated, delivered, adopted by the agent, and propagated into subsequent behavior. We instantiate the protocol as MedHarnessBench, comprising 342 executable tasks across FHIR/EHR operations, healthcare-administration interfaces, and multimodal clinical tools. Across more than 16,000 controlled task executions, MedHarness yields broad improvements in terminal task success, intermediate subtask completion, and healthcare-specific process quality. We further evaluate MedHarness against multiple general-purpose harnesses and use controlled single-fault perturbations to verify the sensitivity and discrimination of the seven-dimensional evaluation. Code and resources are available at https://github.com/Tomry1114/Awesome-Agent-Harness-for-Healthcare.

Why it counts

These results demonstrate that healthcare-specific runtime support can substantially improve both task completion and execution quality, while revealing failures that terminal outcomes alone cannot capture.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.