TSR Desk · science · 3 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities
- What
- Where's Waldo? Query-language Preference under Cross-lingual Knowledge Disparities
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 2 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.00606
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Finally, we explore two different approaches that could mitigate this preference under knowledge conflicts: a mechanistic intervention that ablates attention heads associated with query-language preference, and LoRA-based training, which reduces the preference gap by up to 61.5%. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 2 October 2026. Large Language Models increasingly serve as interfaces for knowledge-intensive information seeking tasks across languages by synthesizing multilingual evidence. Prior work has shown that they often exhibit query-language preference -- the tendency to favor sources written in the language of the query -- but has largely examined this behavior in settings where equivalent knowledge is available across languages. However, this bias becomes consequential when sources in different languages provide incomplete or inconsistent accounts of the same fact, since the information users receive then depends on the sources a model selects to use. To characterize query-language preference under such cross-lingual knowledge disparities, we introduce Waldo, a multilingual Question-Answering (QA) benchmark constructed from Wikipedia. Waldo contains 12K QA pairs targeting knowledge gaps, where a fact is available in one language but absent in another, and knowledge conflicts, where language editions provide conflicting versions of the same fact. Evaluating eight models across five languages, we find that when one language edition merely lacks the relevant fact, models generally use evidence from the other language regardless of the query language. Under conflicting accounts, however, model responses strongly align with the document in the query language, causing semantically equivalent queries to elicit different accounts depending on the user's language.
Why it counts
Finally, we explore two different approaches that could mitigate this preference under knowledge conflicts: a mechanistic intervention that ablates attention heads associated with query-language preference, and LoRA-based training, which reduces the preference gap by up to 61.5%.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.