Tabular Deep Learning vs Classical Machine Learning for Urban Land Cover Classification

Our results show that while tree ensembles remain strong general baselines, TDL models can match or exceed their performance when non-linear interactions are significant and imbalance handling is effective, providing complementary advantages for urban land cover mapping. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 17 September 2026. Urban Land Cover (ULC) classification plays a crucial role in urban planning, environmental monitoring, and sustainable development. We study this task using the ULC dataset from the UCI Machine Learning Repository, which includes tabular features derived from high-resolution aerial imagery across nine classes (e.g., roads, trees, grass, water). The dataset presents typical remote sensing challenges, including high dimensionality, heterogeneous features, and class imbalance. In a unified, reproducible pipeline, we benchmark classical machine learning models (e.g., Logistic Regression, SVM, Random Forest, XGBoost, CatBoost) against Tabular Deep Learning (TDL) models (TabNet, FT-Transformer, TabTransformer, TabSeq, and 1D CNNs). To address class imbalance, we employ weighted cross-entropy loss for TDL models and evaluate performance using accuracy, macro-precision, macro-recall, macro-F1, AUC-ROC, and confusion matrices. See code: https://github.com/mtesha/tdl-vs-ml-urbanlandcover

Why it counts

Our results show that while tree ensembles remain strong general baselines, TDL models can match or exceed their performance when non-linear interactions are significant and imbalance handling is effective, providing complementary advantages for urban land cover mapping.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.