RF-VoID: Towards Bandwidth-Efficient Exterior Tile Void Detection via Narrowband

Conventional interpretation first reconstructs a range profile, so its reliability is bounded by the available bandwidth, yet bandwidth is what sets the cost, the acquisition time, and the regulatory footprint of a deployed system. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 14 September 2026. Hidden debonding behind exterior ceramic tiles is a falling-tile hazard, and millimeter-wave radar offers a non-contact way to find it. This work asks whether that bandwidth can be traded for computation. A 4-40 GHz stepped-frequency system scans twelve exterior-wall specimens containing 0.5-1.0 mm air voids at different depths and interfaces, and the bandwidth dependence of A-scan, B-scan, and C-scan interpretation is analyzed to establish the resolution bound. RF-VoID is then proposed, which decides directly on the narrowband complex response: the sub-band is kept in its measured frequency order with amplitude and phase alongside the in-phase and quadrature channels, a dual-branch encoder reads it along the physical frequency axis using relative position encoding and a distance-dependent locality bias, and an inspection-oriented objective handles the class imbalance and the asymmetric error cost of facade screening. Under a mixed-sample protocol the method attains 98.61% accuracy and a 95.84% F1-score with 0.5 GHz of bandwidth, a seventy-two-fold reduction relative to the full sweep, without range-profile reconstruction, deconvolution, or depth-slice selection; on specimens held out entirely from training it remains the strongest of the compared models, with a mean macro F1-score of 62.12% at 0.5 GHz that rises to 68.57% at 1 GHz.

Why it counts

Conventional interpretation first reconstructs a range profile, so its reliability is bounded by the available bandwidth, yet bandwidth is what sets the cost, the acquisition time, and the regulatory footprint of a deployed system.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.