TSRGet The Daily Report
The Singularity Report

TSR Desk · science · 8 September 2026, 01:00 UTC

Knowing What Not to Answer: Selective Non-Compliance in Vision-Language Models

What
Knowing What Not to Answer: Selective Non-Compliance in Vision-Language Models
Who
arxiv.org
When
7 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
Category
Science
Primary source
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.04720
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.

In this paper, we introduce KoNA, a benchmark for evaluating selective non-compliance in VLMs across five categories: False Premise, Visual Inaccessibility, Universal Unknown, Task Feasibility, and Safety. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 7 September 2026. Vision-language models (VLMs) are expected to respond helpfully to appropriate requests while withholding compliance with requests that are incorrect, unsafe, infeasible, or unanswerable. However, existing benchmarks predominantly evaluate non-compliance at the level of the query as a whole, assuming that each request either warrants compliance or requires withholding compliance. In practice, real-world queries can contain a mixture of answerable content and components for which compliance should be withheld. Each task evaluates two capabilities: query-level non-compliance and component-level non-compliance under paired single and compound queries. Our evaluation across diverse VLMs shows that models often fail to refuse, correct, or abstain appropriately, and these failures become more pronounced when queries require selective non-compliance. To address this challenge, we fine-tune VLMs using KoNA examples that require selective non-compliance, together with a fully answerable set that should receive direct answers. Our fine-tuned models achieve substantial improvements in non-compliance accuracy while largely maintaining performance on fully answerable tasks. These results suggest that the fine-tuned models can distinguish between answerable components and those requiring non-compliance and respond in a task-appropriate manner.

Why it counts

In this paper, we introduce KoNA, a benchmark for evaluating selective non-compliance in VLMs across five categories: False Premise, Visual Inaccessibility, Universal Unknown, Task Feasibility, and Safety.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.

No clip. The article still stands.