TSR Desk · science · 4 September 2026, 19:01 UTC
Neurosymbolic Reasoning with Incremental Knowledge for Sample Efficient Hierarchical
- What
- Neurosymbolic Reasoning with Incremental Knowledge for Sample Efficient Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 4 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.02993
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
A compelling approach to improve sample efficiency is to incorporate knowledge into learning and decision-making. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 4 September 2026. (Flat) Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents face significant challenges in environments with sparse rewards that require long-horizon reasoning. In standard Hierarchical RL (HRL), knowledge is encoded in a fixed, non-updatable form, such as architectural choices, and remains unchanged throughout learning. With fixed HRL, reasoning with incremental knowledge learned during exploration is impractical before sufficient environmental knowledge is acquired, leading to poor sample efficiency. In this work, we propose neurosymbolic HRL with {\em Incremental Knowledge (InK)}: symbolic high-level components perform {\em symbolic planning} (e.g. using $D^*$) on an updatable representation of current InK, while low-level goal-conditioned neural modules learn motion primitives through experience using reward shaping. Experiments on navigation tasks demonstrate that incorporating InK substantially improves sample efficiency. Additionally, to perform {\em optimal} symbolic planning given {\em prior} knowledge about the world, we develop Belief World Tree Search. The code is available at https://github.com/CPS-research-group/ink_bwts.
Why it counts
A compelling approach to improve sample efficiency is to incorporate knowledge into learning and decision-making. Experiments on navigation tasks demonstrate that incorporating InK substantially improves sample efficiency.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.