TSRGet The Daily Report
The Singularity Report

TSR Desk · compute · 9 September 2026, 07:00 UTC

AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents

What
AtomCite: Verification and Correction of Supplied Page-Level Citations in Multi-Page Documents
Who
arxiv.org
When
9 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
Category
Compute
Primary source
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.05802
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.

Across three model families (Gemini, Claude, and GPT), AtomCite reaches around 93% binary verification accuracy on the injected benchmark, significantly outperforming every OCR-only condition, including a compute-matched control, and exceeding every prior text-based baseline given the same OCR text. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 9 September 2026. Large language models answering questions over multi-page documents are expected to cite the supporting pages, yet supplied citations are sometimes inaccurate, and current evaluations score citations at generation time or against text passages: no existing benchmark evaluates whether a system can verify and correct a page-level citation already attached to an answer. We propose AtomCite, an agentic framework that parses an answer into claims, checks each claim against the image of its cited page, and applies a deterministic repair policy. To evaluate it, we introduce DocCite, to our knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images. Built on MP-DocVQA and DUDE, it combines 928 validated injected instances with 2,468 candidate natural errors harvested from frontier- and efficiency-tier models, of which a two-annotator audit confirms 1,909 as genuine errors. Primary labels are assigned deterministically, not by LLM judges, with the human audit as a separate validation layer. Its repair policy lifts citation precision on the injected mix from a constructed 34% to 87-90% while retaining over 90% of correct claims. AtomCite also transfers: with frozen prompts and zero training, it raises the hallucination-detection scores of two open 7-8B models on five public benchmarks above the same models prompted as direct judges. Finally, the audit shows that noise in automatic labels biases measured verifier accuracy and can reverse system rankings, so evaluations relying only on synthetic or automatic labels risk mismeasuring verification capability.

Why it counts

Across three model families (Gemini, Claude, and GPT), AtomCite reaches around 93% binary verification accuracy on the injected benchmark, significantly outperforming every OCR-only condition, including a compute-matched control, and exceeding every prior text-based baseline given the same OCR text. To evaluate it, we introduce DocCite, to our knowledge the first benchmark for systems that verify and correct page-level citations in document images.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.

No clip. The article still stands.