TSR Desk · science · 31 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
TreasuryQA Bench: Can AI Agents Work an Archive of Scanned Financial Records?
- What
- TreasuryQA Bench: Can AI Agents Work an Archive of Scanned Financial Records?
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 30 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.38924
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
The best, Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, solves 64.8% of attempts and the worst, GPT-5.6 Terra in Codex, solves 16.7%, so the benchmark is far from saturated. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 30 October 2026. Organisations keep decades of financial records as scanned PDFs on shared drives, and AI agents can now reach those drives through Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers. Existing benchmarks do not mirror this production setting because they simplify the task. In some, the relevant documents are handed to the agent, so it never has to search. In others, the agent searches through documents with pre-extracted text, so it never has to read scanned images. We introduce TreasuryQA Bench, which requires both: 70 questions over 1,435 scanned U.S. Treasury publications, held in Veris's high-fidelity Dropbox twin. In each task the agent searches for the relevant file through Dropbox's MCP server, reads the pages it needs with Reducto's hosted OCR server or its own tools, and replies with one exact figure. A Python grader checks each answer against an accepted range around the correct value. In this paper we present results from ten agents. We also test how scan quality affects performance: every agent solves fewer tasks on the blurriest scans. Most failed attempts reply with a wrong number rather than no number, and the most common cause is a digit misread from the scan. Three worked examples are included with their answer keys.
Why it counts
The best, Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code, solves 64.8% of attempts and the worst, GPT-5.6 Terra in Codex, solves 16.7%, so the benchmark is far from saturated.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.