TSR Desk · science · 24 September 2026, 01:00 UTC
Terminal Shrinkage Averaging Reveals a Schedule-Estimator Interaction in LLM Pretraining
- What
- Terminal Shrinkage Averaging Reveals a Schedule-Estimator Interaction in LLM Pretraining
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 23 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25482
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
A qualifying time-to-GPT-2 run also finishes faster than the public baseline used in our experiments, providing preliminary evidence of benchmark acceleration. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 23 September 2026. Large language model (LLM) pretraining conventionally returns the raw final iterate. This couples two design choices: the learning-rate schedule that generates the parameter trajectory and the estimator that constructs the deployed model (e.g. the raw final iterate or a checkpoint average). A schedule that promotes optimization progress may differ from one that minimizes variation in the raw final iterate. Separating these choices creates an opportunity to maintain progress late in training while reducing variation in the returned model. To this end, we propose \emph{Terminal Shrinkage Averaging (TSA)}, which interpolates between the raw final iterate and the average of recent checkpoints to balance recent progress against terminal variation. We analyze how TSA changes the preferred terminal learning-rate schedule under a local quadratic approximation and test this interaction through a sequence of controlled NanoChat experiments. Finally, we demonstrate that the resulting gains transfer to depth-22 NanoChat, where the combined schedule and estimator improve validation quality.
Why it counts
A qualifying time-to-GPT-2 run also finishes faster than the public baseline used in our experiments, providing preliminary evidence of benchmark acceleration. Separating these choices creates an opportunity to maintain progress late in training while reducing variation in the returned model. Finally, we demonstrate that the resulting gains transfer to depth-22 NanoChat, where the combined schedule and estimator improve validation quality.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.