TSR Desk · science · 11 September 2026, 01:00 UTC
SloMoDeblur: A Large-Scale Smartphone Image Deblurring Dataset
- What
- SloMoDeblur: A Large-Scale Smartphone Image Deblurring Dataset
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 10 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2506.19445
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
We benchmark multiple state-of-the-art deblurring models using PSNR and SSIM and observe consistent performance degradation relative to the baseline similarity between the input blurry images and ground truth, underscoring the realism and difficulty of the proposed data. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 10 September 2026. Motion blur remains one of the most common and visually disruptive degradations in real-world smartphone imaging, yet existing deblurring benchmarks are often limited in scale, resolution, or domain relevance. This gap is especially pronounced for smartphones, where rolling shutter, small sensors, and ISP processing produce blur statistics that differ from GoPro/DSLR-based benchmarks. We introduce a large-scale smartphone-oriented deblurring dataset constructed from 240~fps slow-motion video. To approximate exposure-time radiance integration, we synthesize blur by temporally averaging a fixed window of $N=30$ consecutive frames, which corresponds to an effective exposure of $T=1/8$~second, and we select the temporally centered frame as the sharp ground truth. The resulting benchmark contains 42,045 paired blur--sharp images at $1920\times1080$ resolution spanning 843 distinct scenes, with a train/test split of 37,841/4,204 pairs. We release the dataset and generation scripts via HuggingFace to facilitate the development and evaluation of robust, deployment-oriented deblurring methods.
Why it counts
We benchmark multiple state-of-the-art deblurring models using PSNR and SSIM and observe consistent performance degradation relative to the baseline similarity between the input blurry images and ground truth, underscoring the realism and difficulty of the proposed data.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.