TSR Desk · science · 1 November 2026, 01:00 UTC
Representation Complexity Along Learning Trajectories: Trading Width for Precision and Time
- What
- Representation Complexity Along Learning Trajectories: Trading Width for Precision and Time
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 31 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.39027
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Thus, the representation resources required to discover a predictor can substantially exceed those required to represent it once learned. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 31 October 2026. What computational role does overparameterisation play during learning? Information-plane analyses suggest that neural networks can traverse representations substantially more complex than those required by their final predictors. We explore when this transient complexity serves a computational purpose by comparing the representation complexity needed for prediction with that needed to make an unknown target statistically visible through gradient feedback. We introduce an oracle model of neural network learning and use Kolmogorov \(n\)-widths to quantify effective representation complexity. Our main technical result transfers complexity bounds from the forward representation to the corresponding gradient-query features. Combined with statistical-query lower bounds, this gives a task-agnostic lower bound on the initial effective width required for target-dependent gradient information to become detectable. For \(k\)-sparse parity in \(D\) dimensions, a known target admits an \(O(k)\)-width representation, while the general bound already implies a polynomial separation between representation and discovery. We then exploit parity's invariance under coordinatewise sign reflections to identify a sharper unsigned effective width, which removes sign distinctions invisible to the parity information channel. At a transfer-compatible measurement resolution, its critical scale is \(\widetilde{\Theta}_k\left( D^{k-1}\tau^2 \right)\), up to logarithmic factors. Interpreting precision through accumulation over fresh samples yields a corresponding width-time frontier. Experiments support the predicted dimension dependence and examine how optimisation and generalisation depart from this idealised frontier.
Why it counts
Thus, the representation resources required to discover a predictor can substantially exceed those required to represent it once learned.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.