TSR Desk · science · 28 September 2026, 07:00 UTC
Models Got Talent: Identifying High Performing Wearable Human Activity Recognition Models
- What
- Models Got Talent: Identifying High Performing Wearable Human Activity Recognition Models Without Training
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 28 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.06157
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of eight ZCPs on six benchmark HAR datasets, and demonstrate that the top-predicted architectures obtain performance within 7% of that attained by full-scale training of 2,000 randomly sampled architectures. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 28 September 2026. Discovering high performing model architectures for wearables-based Human Activity Recognition (HAR) applications is challenging. The astonishing diversity and variability due to differing sensor locations, recording apparatus, activities, etc., can cause established architectures to perform worse on datasets/tasks they were not designed for. A promising complement to Neural Architecture Search (NAS) involves the development of Zero Cost Proxies (ZCPs), which correlate well with trained performance, but can be computed through a single forward/backward pass on a randomly sampled batch of data. Furthermore, training the top-10 predicted architectures results in performance within 2% of full-scale training, leading to substantial computational savings. Our experiments introduce ZCPs to sensor-based HAR and demonstrate their suitability as an addition to NAS pipelines in practical scenarios.
Why it counts
In this paper, we investigate the effectiveness of eight ZCPs on six benchmark HAR datasets, and demonstrate that the top-predicted architectures obtain performance within 7% of that attained by full-scale training of 2,000 randomly sampled architectures.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.