TSR Desk · science · 13 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
MAGMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Embodied Agents under Dynamic Tasks and Execution Failures
- What
- MAGMA-Bench: Evaluating Long-Horizon Embodied Agents under Dynamic Tasks and Execution Failures
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 12 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.13534
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Supervised adaptation greatly improves a small model, but performance remains substantially lower on longer and multi-robot missions. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 12 October 2026. Long-horizon embodied agents must maintain task-relevant information, coordinate heterogeneous robots, and adapt their decisions as execution unfolds. Existing benchmarks investigate dynamic task execution and embodied multi-agent coordination, but provide limited evaluation of their intersection. We introduce MAGMA-Bench, an architecture-agnostic benchmark for persistent task reasoning in dynamic multi-robot environments. MAGMA-Bench evaluates agents across increasing task horizons and controlled online perturbations, including execution failures, task interruptions, and mission updates, with scenarios requiring coordination across robots with heterogeneous capabilities. It uses a structured skill-level interface to separate task-level reasoning from perception and low-level control. We evaluate locally deployable open-weight planners, multi-agent state-tracking strategies, and frontier models. Even the strongest evaluated models fail on a substantial fraction of clean episodes, and their success rates decrease further under online perturbations. We release the benchmark, 261,646 task-level training examples, and an architecture-agnostic expert-trace generation pipeline.
Why it counts
Supervised adaptation greatly improves a small model, but performance remains substantially lower on longer and multi-robot missions.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.