TSR Desk · science · 31 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
GUITestScape: Towards Open-set Evaluation on Exploratory GUI Testing
- What
- GUITestScape: Towards Open-set Evaluation on Exploratory GUI Testing
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 30 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.29532
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
First, existing benchmarks focus almost exclusively on interaction defects, leaving display defects outside the evaluation frame. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 30 October 2026. Exploratory GUI testing is a particularly demanding setting for MLLM agents: without predefined test scripts, an agent must autonomously navigate an application and discover defects through its own interaction. However, current evaluation falls short on two fronts. Second, evaluation protocols are bound to predefined defect annotations, collapsing the testing process into a single end-state judgment that conflates qualitatively distinct failure modes. To address these challenges, we present GUITestScape, an interactive benchmark covering 61 real-world Android applications and 508 preset defects spanning interaction and display types, and introduce GUIJudge, an open-set evaluator that decomposes an agent's testing trajectory into independently diagnosable capabilities. Experimental results demonstrate that GUIJudge achieves reliable process-aware evaluation beyond predefined annotations, substantially outperforming all baselines. Benchmarking on GUITestScape further reveals that detection remains the critical bottleneck for existing models across both defect types, and that integrating GUIJudge's verifiers into existing agents significantly boosts their detection performance without retraining.
Why it counts
First, existing benchmarks focus almost exclusively on interaction defects, leaving display defects outside the evaluation frame.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.