TSR Desk · mathematics · 8 September 2026, 01:00 UTC
GSM8K-V: Can Vision Language Models Solve Grade School Math Word Problems in Visual Contexts
- What
- GSM8K-V: Can Vision Language Models Solve Grade School Math Word Problems in Visual Contexts
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 7 September 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Mathematics
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25160
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Evaluation of 34 VLMs reveals a striking modality gap: while most models exceed 90\% on text, the best model achieves only 59\% on GSM8K-V, far below the 91\% human accuracy. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 7 September 2026. Mathematical reasoning is a key capability for vision-language models (VLMs), yet current benchmarks mainly evaluate text-based or explicitly symbolic visual inputs. It remains unclear whether VLMs can reason mathematically when information must be perceived and inferred from images rather than read from explicit symbols. We introduce GSM8K-V, a benchmark transforming GSM8K into multi-image sequences with semantic equivalence preserved. By mapping text-based problems into visual form via an automated pipeline and human verification, we curate 1,319 high-quality samples. In GSM8K-V, quantities must be extracted through visual perception, and reasoning chains must be reconstructed by integrating implicit cues across scenes. Notably, models enhanced for visual math reasoning show no improvement on GSM8K-V despite large gains on existing benchmarks, confirming that it evaluates a distinct capability. Error analysis shows that the primary bottleneck lies in Implicit Visual Inference Error (IVIE), where models fail to recover visual semantics that are implied rather than explicitly stated. Our code and data are released at https://github.com/ZJU-REAL/GSM8K-V.
Why it counts
Evaluation of 34 VLMs reveals a striking modality gap: while most models exceed 90\% on text, the best model achieves only 59\% on GSM8K-V, far below the 91\% human accuracy. Notably, models enhanced for visual math reasoning show no improvement on GSM8K-V despite large gains on existing benchmarks, confirming that it evaluates a distinct capability.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.