TSR Desk · science · 11 November 2026, 01:00 UTC
Group of Skills: Group-Structured Skill Retrieval for Agent Skill Libraries
- What
- Group of Skills: Group-Structured Skill Retrieval for Agent Skill Libraries
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 10 November 2026, 05:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2605.06978
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
Across SkillsBench, ALFWorld, and Terminal-Bench 2 with six backbones, GoSkills attains the highest mean reward or accuracy among the evaluated methods in every benchmark-backbone setting, and matched controls show higher reward and fewer agent turns with group selection than with fixed-contract or post-hoc role-annotation alternatives. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 10 November 2026. Skill-augmented agents increasingly rely on large reusable skill libraries, but retrieving relevant skills is not the same as presenting usable context. Existing methods typically return atomic skills or dependency-aware bundles whose internal roles remain implicit, leaving the agent to infer the execution entry point, support skills, visible requirements, and failure-avoidance guidance. We introduce Group of Skills (GoSkills), an inference-time group-structured retrieval method that changes the agent-facing retrieval object from a flat skill list to a compact, role-labeled execution context. GoSkills builds anchor-centered skill groups from a typed skill graph, expands support groups through a group graph, bottlenecks the selected group plan into a bounded set of atomic skill payloads, and renders a fixed execution contract with Start, Support, Check, and Avoid fields, without changing the downstream agent, skill payloads, or execution environment.
Why it counts
Across SkillsBench, ALFWorld, and Terminal-Bench 2 with six backbones, GoSkills attains the highest mean reward or accuracy among the evaluated methods in every benchmark-backbone setting, and matched controls show higher reward and fewer agent turns with group selection than with fixed-contract or post-hoc role-annotation alternatives.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.