Getting Space Right: Agentic Rewards for Image Generation

On SpaRW-Eval, SpatialCritic achieves 95.1% verification accuracy, outperforming 320B GLM-5.3-Flash with a 40x smaller 8B backbone and raising average baseline scores from 78.4 to 83.9 on SD3.5-Medium and 83.2 to 86.5 on BAGEL. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 14 October 2026. Reinforcement learning (RL) is promising for spatial text-to-image generation, but existing work largely focuses on policy optimization, assuming accurate rewards and effective online rollouts. We observe in-domain gains with out-of-domain degradation, exposing two limitations: unreliable spatial rewards in open-world settings and rollouts lacking basic-to-complex progression. We propose a curriculum-guided RL framework. First, we introduce SpatialCritic, an agentic reward model equipped with a spatial perception harness that combines reusable verification guidance with specialized vision tools. We then construct spatial preference datasets through targeted counterfactual perturbations and perform agent-harness alignment to improve tool selection and evidence integration efficiently. Second, curriculum learning organizes shared foundational capabilities and their compositional dependencies in a capability graph for mastery-guided rollouts, periodic review, and targeted remediation. Project page: https://xiaofeng-tan.github.io/projects/spatialcritic/

Why it counts

On SpaRW-Eval, SpatialCritic achieves 95.1% verification accuracy, outperforming 320B GLM-5.3-Flash with a 40x smaller 8B backbone and raising average baseline scores from 78.4 to 83.9 on SD3.5-Medium and 83.2 to 86.5 on BAGEL. We observe in-domain gains with out-of-domain degradation, exposing two limitations: unreliable spatial rewards in open-world settings and rollouts lacking basic-to-complex progression. We then construct spatial preference datasets through targeted counterfactual perturbations and perform agent-harness alignment to improve tool selection and evidence integration efficiently.

Sources

Primary source: primary source

What is not known

This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.