TSR Desk · science · 7 October 2026, 01:00 UTC
Benchmarking Psychological Dynamics in Generative Agents
- What
- Benchmarking Psychological Dynamics in Generative Agents
- Who
- arxiv.org
- When
- 6 October 2026, 04:00 UTC
- Category
- Science
- Primary source
- https://arxiv.org/abs/2610.04246
- What is not known
- This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
The first, internal validity, quantifies whether generated trajectories reproduce the internal structure of repeated human measurement: distributions, the between- versus within-person variance partition, temporal dependence, and range. It comes from a paper posted to arXiv on 6 October 2026. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed to simulate human behavior, acting as computational replicas of human subjects. Yet the lived psychological experience of humans is difficult to benchmark, particularly as it unfolds over time. We introduce a psychometric benchmark for computational replicas: personas that carry a fixed identity through an evolving sequence of events. Built entirely from published norms and meta-analytic effects, the benchmark scores two dimensions of psychological realism. The second, external validity, quantifies whether replicas recover established trait, state, and indicator relations. Across 36 open-weight and proprietary LLMs from nine developers (1B-671B parameters), most recover the direction of established relations (84.3% mean agreement) and the variance partition (26 of 34), yet the within-person correlation and distributional structure elude recovery. Internal validity is independent of scale and capability: a mid-size open LLM (Gemma-3-27B) strikes the best trade-off between the two dimensions. The benchmark is a precondition for using computational replicas in causal inference across domains (e.g., marketing, healthcare), and identifies within-person grounding as the central challenge ahead.
Why it counts
The first, internal validity, quantifies whether generated trajectories reproduce the internal structure of repeated human measurement: distributions, the between- versus within-person variance partition, temporal dependence, and range.
Sources
Primary source: primary source
What is not known
This brief does not claim independent replication. Claims that appear only on X and not in the primary source stay unknown.
No clip. The article still stands.